US HIV Travel Ban lifted .... Ryan White Act signed .... Obama & inclusivity again ....

President Obama said today his administration is lifting a 22-year-old ban that prevented persons with HIV/AIDS from entering the country.

"It's a step that will encourage people to get tested and get treatment, it's a step that will keep families together, and it's a step that will save lives," Obama said, noting that the process of reversing the rule began during the George W. Bush presidency.

The United States was the first country to institute such a ban, "a decision rooted in fear rather than fact," Obama said. Now only a dozen nations continue the practice. "If we want to be the global leader in combating HIV/AIDS, we need to act like it," the president said.

Obama made the announcement as he signed the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act of 2009, which provides help to more than half a million Americans.


White was the 13-year-old from Kokomo, Ind., who in 1984 contracted AIDS after a blood transfusion, and became internationally known by fighting for his right to attend school.

White died in 1990, but his legacy lives on. Obama said that because of Ryan's courage, "we didn't just become more informed about HIV/AIDS, we began to take action to fight it."


White's mother, Jeanne, attended the White House signing ceremony (pictured).

(by David Jackson; photo by Gerald Herbert, Associated Press)

What can we learn from the new US Hate Crimes Bill?

="

Golding and Simpson Miller failed to lead article clearly shows the cowardice of our political leaders to remove any hints of rights or freedoms to GLTBQ Jamaicans because of fear, ignorance or plain hypocracy, they play to the gallery to sure up political capital.

Coincidentally we have a wonderful example of the US Hate Crime Bill being passed as we pussyfoot with our own Charter of Rights debate, a set of rights set out that have been on and off the nation's and parliament's agenda for the past 17+ years with Joint select committee after joint select committees arguing over definition of words such as "sex" "gender" worrying that the gay lobby will try to move an action to ask for marriage rights. The removal of an entire section on discrimination of persons by sexual orientation the very thing that this US bill has sought to make tantamount in as far as the death of Matthew Shepard is concerned with agitation from his family, rights groups & individuals and some state officials for nearly ten years.

see the Hate Crimes Prevention Act (Introduced in Senate)
Charter of Rights Bill a hit with US Embassy, even without LGBT rights included
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed in the US


They are those who use the procreation arguments to justify their bigoted agenda totally overlooking the need to protect the minority and least amongst us. As one radio host puts it "The rule of the tyrannical majority" Jamaica has not grasped the concept of rights and freedoms for all and wish to be selective about who should or should not enjoy them, it is not universal in our context.

So what can we learn from this wonderful example from our neighbour up north?
my answers, you can form your own please:

1. Learn from the actual verbiage
2. Engage in discussions about rights, tolerance, strategies used to devise our own
3. Confront opposition in a meaningful and respectful manner
4. Community education drives to get persons to understand the importance of universal rights
5. Examine the coverage granted in the US bill for our own adoption
6. Demand our politicians stop hiding behind "red herring" topics and pontifications
7. Embrace the tolerant citizenry for peaceful co-existence
8. Resolute stance on violence and verbal attacks from homophobes
9. Case studies where appropriate for analysis
   

these are just some things that come to mind you may have a plethora of others, let's continue the dialogue to arrive at amicable solutions to this homophobic problem in Jamaica

Peace

H

Equality Florida asks you to sign letter to ‘stop murder music’

Nadine Smith at Equality Florida:



It's been just one month since five Florida performances were announced for Buju Banton. Since then, three venues have canceled the notorious singer whose lyrics call for the torture and murder of gay people.
His song "Boom Bye Bye" is advocates pouring acid on LGBT people, "burning them up bad like an old tire wheel", and shooting them in the head with an AK-47. He also sings "Anytime Buju Banton come, f--gots get up and run ... they have to die".


Do your part to stand up to anti-gay incitements to violence.

Sign the letter to venue owners and elected officials.
Buju Banton is still scheduled to perform in three Florida cities this week. Thursday, Oct. 29th, in Jacksonville, Friday. Saturday, Oct. 31st, in Miami; and a new date was added for Friday, Oct. 30th, in St. Petersburg.


We will present this letter to venue owners and elected officials
While other cities in Florida and across the country have canceled Bantons concerts, the venues in Jacksonville, St. Petersburg, and Miami have not yet responded. We're calling upon the venue owners and elected officials to take a stand against hate.
"Boom Bye Bye" has become an international gay bashing anthem. In 2004, Brian Williamson, Jamaica's leading gay activist, was violently chopped to death with a machete in his apartment in Kingston. A reporter walked to his street shortly after the murder and found a crowd of people gathered outside Williamson’s apartment singing and celebrating his murder and shouting the chorus of “Boom Bye Bye”.


Equality Florida staff have received an unprecedented flood of hate mail and threats in response to our public opposition to Banton's hateful lyrics. One staff member received a letter stating: "YOU ARE STARTING A WAR IN WHICH YOU WILL BE KILLED" And another says "YOU'LL BE 6 FEET UNDER PERMANENTLY."


WE MUST STAND UP TO THESE HATEFUL ATTACKS


So far, due to an outpouring of opposition from Equality Florida members and community allies, management at the venues in Tampa and Orlando have canceled Banton's performances; the Tallahassee event in now listed as withdrawn on the Eventful.com website; and Toyota has dropped it's sponsorship of the Miami event. Jacksonville management has not responded.
Do your part to stand up to hate in these communities.



Sign onto the letter that we will send to the venue owners and elected officials in Jacksonville, St. Petersburg, and Miami.

Golding and Simpson Miller failed to lead

October 26, 2009 - Gleaner Editorial

We wish to make two observations. First, when politicians are short of cogent and workable solutions, their default position, usually, is a reach for populist distractions - drawing the red herring, as it were.

The second is that the real test of a democracy is not only its ability to cater to the will of the majority, but how well it acknowledges and protects the rights of the minority, including people with whose ideas and concepts we may not agree. Indeed, it is this latter notion that makes a democracy, even as it remains the best form of government yet devised, the most difficult to manage.

We have been drawn to think on these issues in part because of some of the tone of the parliamentary debate on Jamaica's proposed Charter of Rights, especially remarks by Prime Minister Bruce Golding and Opposition Leader Portia Simpson Miller. They reached for the lowest common denominator and played to the gallery, which, of course, was not necessarily the people sitting in Gordon House. Rather, it was an appeal to their ever-narrowing political base.

Enumerative fashion

The Charter of Rights is a good thing, which has the broad support of this newspaper. It seeks to set out, in enumerative fashion and relatively simple language, the fundamental rights and freedoms of the Jamaican people. Importantly, it seeks to place greater limits on the capacity of the state to derogate those rights.

Significantly, however, there is no protection in this charter for the individual who faces discrimination because of his or her sexual orientation. A parliamentary committee that drafted the final recommendations contorted its way out of offering any such protection. That was, and remains, good political cover for Mr Golding and Mrs Simpson Miller and, we dare say, a goodly many members of parliament.

The fact is, Jamaica is deeply homophobic, or pretends to be. Homophobia attends the country's sense of machismo; it frees us to go gay-bashing, and not just figuratively. Indeed, the week before the MPs began to sing their platitudes to the Charter of Rights, a young man was attacked by a mob for his perceived effeminate gait. Happily, he was rescued by the police, for which he might count himself lucky.

Lack of imagination

This brings us back to where we started. The debate is taking place in the middle of a deep economic crisis, to which the Government has, up to now, displayed a patent lack of imagination or acuity. It has talked!

We are not surprised, in the circumstances, that Mr Golding found it useful to weave into his remarks a declaration that "I will not accept that homosexuality must be accepted as a legitimate form of behaviour or the equivalent of (heterosexual) marriage".

The Jamaican Parliament, Mr Golding added, would not make same-sex unions legal - "not as long as I sit here". And he inveighed against gay-rights lobbyists who wanted to undermine the country's "values or culture".

Mrs Simpson Miller was not as extreme in hiding behind the supposed inability of leaders to be "too far in front of those who are being led" and for the positions of the majority to be taken "scrupulously into consideration".

What, in reality, was on display was weak leadership and, we fear, an unintended endorsement of abuse of and discrimination against people because of their sexual orientation.

Intolerance begets intolerance (Letter to Gleaner 27.10.09)

The Editor, Sir:

While Buju Banton (Mark Myrie) is by no means the only Jamaican artiste to sing a song that promotes violence against homosexual men, he has become the target of many gay-rights groups internationally. He has had several concerts cancelled and has been met with protests at many other venues.

This may seem a bit unfair, given that he is not alone in singing such lyrics, or the fact that the song was released almost 20 years ago, and the artiste has since softened his image tremendously.

What is, however, surprising is the hypocrisy of those in Jamaica who have come out in support of Buju and others. They complain that foreigners should not interfere in Jamaica's internal matters when gays are persecuted and prosecuted and hate is spewed at several groups with impunity, but in the same breath, expect foreigners to sit by and allow those from outside to come into their countries and perpetuate the same hatred they are allowed to in Jamaica.

Minority-rights protection

The same principle of minority-rights protection that people like Buju want in places like the US, Canada or in Europe are, in principle, the same ones that gay-rights groups would like Jamaicans to protect in relation to the gay and lesbian community, among others.

On what basis should a foreigner like Buju be allowed into the US, Canada or the EU to sing freely about killing gays, while gay citizens from these countries who visit Jamaica could be subjected to 10 or more years in prison in Jamaica?

Jamaicans cannot expect to avail themselves of the freedoms in these societies when they refuse to extend similar freedoms to the citizens of these countries. Buju and others have no right to enter or perform in the US, in the same way that American gays have no right to be themselves in Jamaica.

In the same way that Jamaica feels it has the right to protect its societal values, Americans have the right to protect their values. It is all about reciprocity.

I am, etc.,

RICARDO SMALLING
rsmalling@sympatico

Let the dust settle .......... part 2

Let the dust settle part 1 spoke to the whole accusations and counter accusations between Buju Banton and the gay community in the United States predominantly San Francisco the described gay capital of the world where Buju's tour has met with fierce opposition.

Now the dust has settled somewhat what do we see? Buju seems to have won this round (lost the war overall) with more dates slowly added to his tour and the American Civil Liberties group in Miami coming in support of him in a statement issued some time ago (who cares?) they seemed to have missed the boat in as far as understanding the requests or commands in Buju's lyrics to kill gay men and the methods prescribed, of note shooting directly in the head with an Uzi.
My calling for letting the dust settle was to get us to see the landscape more clearly and get rid of the noise and smoke from opposers and supporters alike from all sides. Of note the gay people who met with him in San Francisco have not responded to the criticisms levied by some in the music industry locally and in some instances seem to suggest the meetings never happened and the photos of Buju bumping fists with gays were doctored which I found so ridiculous, folks will do anything to deny or avoid discussing issues directly that they find all kind of silly excuses.

There is also talk of Buju loosing allegedly millions from cancellations a point I have a little difficulty digesting as most of the venues are small club houses not arenas of stadiums like he used to get in his heyday of Til Shiloh CD prominence.
Will the gay groups get another chance to meet him face to face again? I doubt it unless they resort to picketing him and his shows again or some miracle in the future. I feel he now knows how to play the game with PR and press while working his contacts in the community even though he doesn't support us. It would have been good if the folks who met with him used the time to discuss the situation here in Jamaica and how to help to defuse the fiery homophobic climate in our nation with a serious view to meaningful tolerance.
Some within the opposition are trying to get information on hate crimes from the agencies of government of all places including the police, this clearly shows the still lack of knowledge of the Jamaican situation and apprising oneself at best some more before launching into actions. I hope that the endeavours are tracked and noted carefully.

Be it resolved though that the interventions from our foreign supporters are welcomed however how interested is the average GLBT Jamaican on the ground if one should poll or even just ask about the present impasse many don't even care or are just becoming aware due to mainstream media coverage especially from US cable stations as many Jamaicans have cable service, the question is whose fault is that and how do we fix that? boi mi nuh know yah sah

JFLAG's silence until recently when I feel it was forced to respond because of pronounced media coverage and the photos from the meeting on blogs and news sites worldwide was disturbing to me, the group said it was not impressed. My criticism of them and ordinary GLBT Jamaicans goes further as there hasn't been any serious public support for the interventions by the Cancel Buju Banton campaign not even so much as a response, Jamaican membership or statement on the website. I guess some are timid and don't wish to publicly show support and are emotionally there in spirit as some of the Facebook comments and private messages suggest but can we be in the shadows and cowards all the days of our lives?
Now is the time to begin picking our brains to finding formidable solutions now that the issue of Murder music has gotten the public attention it deserves from an American standpoint as actions like this are normal in Europe and the UK through their own Stop Murder Music campaigns respectively. Recently Sizzla was in the news as his show was cancelled by SMM Bern.

We have to keep the issues alive in Jamaica or it may just die as a nine day wonder as some have, while doing so however new ideas must be found to strike a balance needed to push tolerance. (fan away the extra dust)

Peace and walk good

also see:
Gays may have overstepped their bounds giving Buju ultimatum says human rights activist

Golding and Simpson Miller failed to lead (Gleaner Editorial on the Charter of Rights debate)

H

Dominican Educator believes buggery laws should be decriminalized

Interesting similarities to our local scenario on the HIV/MSM access to healthcare landscape.
A local family life educator in Dominica believes that the decriminalization of the island's buggery laws should be given consideration.Valda Bruno-Durand told a press conference organised by the Dominica Planned Parenthood Association recently that the issue should also be about accepting an individual.“It’s about accepting the choice an individual make. In terms of our laws, we know the laws against homosexuality. I think we should see it as an issue of development and an issue of health. It is now being seen as a moral and religious issue. People say things like our country will be damned; our society will become Sodom and Gomorrah.

As we see now Jamaica is not the only Caribbean territory struggling with this issue of MSM sex and HIV/AIDS intervention coupled with efforts from the religious community to chastise GLBT people by beating them with the Bible and condemnatory remarks and endorsing ecclesiastically tinged old colonial buggery laws to stifle personal freedoms. This educator like some of our local HIV experts have also spoken out to demand revision or decriminalization of the buggery laws or at least some considerations so we can deal with properly serving the MSM community in terms of treatment and education is often met with deafening silence or outright opposition from weak politicians and the religious bigots who pander to the so called popular sentiments to remain politically viable.

"You hear all these things and we seem to leave out the human aspect of it,” she said. Bruno-Durand, who is an outspoken human rights activist, also gave a religious spin on the matter. She said persons must also remember that God makes no mistake. "We use the bible as our weapon but we leave out certain aspects. No one is asking that you should become a homosexual. We are also not saying that homosexuals should be going around and encourage other individuals to become homosexuals. That is not what the issue is about.
It is about helping young persons progress,” she said.Meantime Bruno-Durand said men who have sex with men are not coming forward to get tested for HIV/AIDS. She said decriminalization of homosexuality could prompt gays to come forward and get tested.“In Dominica, in terms of our HIV statistics, we have more men than women who are testing positive.

The statistics is baffling because that is only a situation in Dominica. Everywhere else, the rates of infections are highest in women. Dominica has a very high MSM (Men who have Sex with Men) population and this is what is driving the epidemic,” he said.She said the matter should be looked at in a positive way.“We need to see how we can create a better society and not how we can pass judgment on the individuals. Too many times we tend to judge too quickly,” she added.
Buggery or homosexuality is illegal in Dominica.

Buggery in my estimation however is not homosexuality and is also practised by heterosexual couples although it is hard to quantify the levels here in Jamaica since it is a taboo issue.

H

excerpts from Dominica online

Buju gets green light to perform in Miami

Howard Campbell
Buju Banton, whose Rasta Got Soul tour of the United States has been dogged by protests from gay rights groups, will perform at the Reggae Bash show in Miami this week.

The event was in danger of being cancelled after groups like Equality Florida wrote to city officials, including Mayor Manuel Diaz, complaining that some of Banton's music incites violence against gays.

Andrew Minott of promoters Global Vybz Entertainment told The Gleaner last week that the show will take place on Saturday at the 5,000-seat James L. Knight Center.

"Everything's good, everything's on," Minott said.

According to Minott, a statement from the Florida chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) admonishing the gay groups may have saved the day. It accused them of promoting censorship.

Written by the Florida ACLU's executive director Howard Simon, the statement was published in the October 18 edition of the Miami Herald.

"I guess when they (gay groups) saw that letter, they backed off," Minott said.

Members of Global Vybz have had dialogue with the gay lobbyists. They recently appeared in a panel discussion with Equality Florida spokesperson Vanessa Brito on WAVS, a south Florida-based Caribbean radio station.

Even though is company got the green light, Minott admits the negative publicity seems to have hurt.

"Ticket sales are slow, I think all the protest talk made people weary," he said.

Equality Florida is the latest gay rights organisation to come out against Banton performing in a major US city. Similar protests forced the cancellation or rescheduling of Rasta Got Soul shows in Salt Lake City, Utah, Columbus, Ohio, Richmond, Virginia and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The groups say their protests are driven by the violent tone of Banton's 1992 anti-gay anthem, Boom Bye Bye.

Banton met gay activists prior to his show in San Francisco two weeks ago.

They demanded he reach out to homosexuals, including those in Jamaica.

News you can use - The right to duty counsel

The Legal Aid Council, an arm of the Ministry of Justice provides legal services for persons who are in police custody and are without privately retained lawyers through the Duty Counsel Programme.

The programme provides attorneys-at-law, available to persons who are in police custody either as a result of being a suspect in a criminal matter or are being accused (charged with an offence), but yet to appear in a court of law.

The Legal Aid Regulations stipulates that everyone has a right to Duty Counsel.

How does the system work?

To ensure that the system works effectively and efficiently, it is important that law enforcement personnel advise detainees or accused persons of their right to Duty Counsel. Each police station has a list of the names and contact information of a duty counsel available to that station. The detainee himself/herself may ask the police to contact the duty counsel. No questioning of the suspect should be done in the absence of his/her lawyer.

In cases where police personnel are unsuccessful in contacting counsel, the Legal Aid Clinics or the Legal Aid Council may be contacted for assistance.

What is the role of the Duty Counsel?

Having accepted a matter, Duty Counsel will visit the lock-up, correctional institution or remand facility and interview the client, give advice, provide representation at a question and answer session or identification parade. The lawyer may also apply for station or court bail on the first court appearance of the accused, and where the circumstances require, file a Writ of Habeus Corpus to prevent suspects or accused persons remaining in custody for lengthy periods.

Is there a cost?

Duty Counsel is available regardless of the offence the person is suspected of or charged with. There is no cost to the recipient of Duty Counsel, thereby guaranteeing the citizen access to legal representation. No application form is necessary to obtain Duty Counsel. The lawyer's duties end at the first court appearance of the accused or at such earlier time, for example on the release of the client.

What happens after the first court appearance?

After the end of Duty Counsel, where further assistance is needed, an application may be made for legal aid. If granted, an attorney is assigned to the matter for trial.

Currently, of a panel of approximately 320 attorneys, more than 190 are enlisted for Duty Counsel requests.

For further information regarding the Duty Counsel Programme, contact the Legal Aid Council, located at 72 Harbour Street, Kingston, telephone 948-6999 or the Justice Education Unit of the Ministry of Justice, telephone 908-4761.

The hypocritical and opportunist religous right

the caption is so appropriate in our scenario......

So as we see in the post following this one from the Gleaner that the church has, as a matter of convenience sided with the DJs on bashing homosexuality, at least so they claim. In trying to distance themselves from the violence as advocated by Buju Banton and others they, the religious right to me are looking like a bunch of opportunist and waggonists using this convenient sorded episode to push their bigoted positions.

Interestingly the same dancehall artists who they now side with also promote casual sex with minors, abuse of women and ganja smoking, murder of informants, vigilante justice, glorifying acts of gun crimes as measurements of being a true man among other acts deemed sinful and abominations by the church are not met with such a loud chorus of opposition, where are they on these matters?

(night sounds and a cricket chirps)

How selective these church people are? that is not say that all christians or church folk are like this as there are more enlightened folks in the crowd they just don't or can't be bothered I guess to challenge the crap coming out of the penny section. The use of the Bible is where the selectivity really is, the same verses used as quotes to condemn us (noteably Leviticus 18) also has a list of others wrongs and ills which were prescribed for Jews to Moses at that time and to suggest that Sodom and Gomorrah argument is so lame as we all know that that homosexuality was not the predominant reasons why it was destroyed. Sometimes one should ignore this crap but I think also we must let people make fools of themselves and the public is slowly becoming weary of all this constant arguments over persons orientation and related activities. The church should concern itself about the poor and indigent who are visible to our eyes everyday on the streets who really need the help, prayer and love, the homeless children in homes whoneed care and support and stop trying to pry through my and others keyhole to see who we are sleeping with.

Waggonists
This is not the first time the anti gay church lobby has joined in a chorus of sorts to echo their anti gay sentiments, those sentiments are more often times than not have an invitation to tolerance or peace. The rhetoric is usually condemnatory in its form yet the same Bible that is used to beat us says judge not and ye shall not be judged:

Judging Others
Lk. 6.3738, 4142
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

How we forget the other parts of the Bible and conveniently use parts that seem divisive to justify bigotry and hate sending us to hell from the pulpit and applauding yourselves for doing a marvellous job.

I am not a Bible genius but certain actions of the church or some of it's members warrant examination. Didn't Christ also say come as you are and have we forgotten the woman with the alabaster box?

Peace

H

The Church and the DJs agree (Gleaner 25.10.09)

please also view:
Meeting controversy, Music industry split over Buju's face to face with gays

... but his pockets burn, Cancellations of shows because of gay advocates cost artiste millions

American civil liberties group slams gays for trying to prevent shows featuring Jamaican DJ

Buju did the right thing ...

Athaliah Reynolds wrote
Some church leaders have come out in full support of Jamaica's dancehall fraternity while condemning the actions of international gay rights groups that are placing immense pressure on many local artistes.

While the church leaders who spoke with The Sunday Gleaner argued that it was wrong to incite violence against any group, most agreed that the dancehall artistes had a right to express their disagreement with the homosexual lifestyle.

"To those artistes who have continued to speak out against that kind of lifestyle in their music, I'll encourage them to keep up the pressure, not in a violent way, but certainly to continue to proclaim the message," Bishop Delford Davis of the Power of Faith Ministries in Portmore said.

the truth

According to Davis, while the church is completely against violence, the truth must be told and not censored.

"Truth is very costly, I think they should be strong enough to maintain their position in as much as they are being penalised. A price has always had to be paid for truth."

Davis said his message to the DJs would be to remove the element of violence from their music, but continue to spread the message that a lifestyle of homosexuality is immoral and wrong.

"Do not incite violence, but certainly continue to propagate the message of sanctity of human sexuality. We fully support the message that is proclaimed of God's purpose and plan for procreation and human sexuality," he argued.

For pastor Bobby Wilmot of the Joy Town Community Development Founda-tion when the gays took their lifestyle into the public domain they opened themselves for criticisms.

"When you were practising your homosexual lifestyle privately, fine, that's in your space. But the moment you bring it into the public domain you are saying to people they must accept it and therefore that gives me the right to reject it," he argued.

Wilmot continued: "Now as a man of God, I would reject it from a word of God, but the man who is in the dancehall, who is not coming necessarily from a Christian perspective, this is how he operates. He's going to come at it in his way."

Wilmot said while he does not support violence, he has to agree with the stance of the dancehall man.

"I would respond by saying Sodom and Gomorra was destroyed by God, so take heed to that, there's a lesson there!"

Wilmot bashed the gay community for forcing the cancellation of concerts featuring some dancehall artistes.

"When you cut me off like that, you are preventing me from bringing my views to the public - you are not fair, it can't be right," he said. "You say this is my lifestyle before the public, I must be allowed also to say I am against it."

Reverend Donald Webley of the, Rosemount Missionary Church in Montego Bay, St James was critical of both groups.

"The same level of force being used by the gay community to undermine the dancehall artiste is similar to the way in which some dancehall artistes have been advocating violence towards them. Both of them seem to be using a similar approach to get their messages across."

He added: "I think the dancehall artistes need to have the opportunity to express themselves but of course not in a violent way."

Webley said the recent demands of the gay community of reggae artiste, Buju Banton are ludicrous. "The demands that have been made upon him are outrageous and unreasonable."

According to Webley, Buju should publicly apologise and withdraw the anti-homosexual anthem Boom Bye Bye because it is clearly violent.

But Webley argued that the homosexual community should not use its power to undermine Buju's ability to earn or to support a lifestyle that he is morally against.

homosexuals right

For Pastor Raphael Thomas of the Annotto Bay Gospel Hall believes that the homosexual community is right to target the concerts of some Jamaican artistes.

"I don't think it is right to promote violence against those who practise that kind of lifestyle, although it is not something that the church can endorse. They are people that the church must reach out to and seek to help them just like persons who are involved in other kinds of activities that are not considered right."

According to Pastor Thomas the violent approach of the dancehall artiste is not right.

"We respect the orientation of the DJs and their strong disagreement with that kind of lifestyle but it still does not give them a right to promote violence against the homosexuals." Pastor Thomas said.

"There are other ways that we can seek to correct, what I consider to be the unacceptable lifestyle of the gay community without seeking to be violent towards them," added Thomas.

athaliah.reynolds@gleanerjm.com

Charter of Rights Bill a hit with US Embassy, even without LGBT rights included

Vivian Crawford (second left), executive director, the Institute of Jamaica (IOJ), entertains Dr Don Baker (left), political officer at the US Embassy in St Andrew, and Katherine Rafaniello (right) and Bianca Obllins, the embassy's vice-consuls, at the IOJ Oct 22, 2009. - Norman Grindley/Chief Photographer

Meanwhile the US accepts New Hate Crime Bill to include GLBT people, how ironic?

Congress Extends Hate Crime Law To Gays

here is the US Embassy article in today's Gleaner:

Kimesha Walters

AN AMERICAN political officer is lauding Jamaica for creating a Charter of Rights Bill, saying it was healthy for an emerging economy to recognise the rights of its citizens. The officer also pointed to the possibility of an improved relationship with the United States given the push for a new charter.

Dr Don Baker says the United States has a similar policy, and he suspects that the Jamaican format will be similar.

However, he noted that there is no single way of being a democracy.

Baker revealed that despite tarnishes due to crime and violence, the country has maintained a good report in the US Embassy's annual human-rights reports, specifically in the area democracy.

"Jamaica respects the human rights of its citizens, for the most part. It has some challenges in terms of crime and those things but we're hopeful that Jamaica will continue to address these issues," Baker told The Gleaner after a presentation at the Institute of Jamaica (IOJ) yesterday.

The political officer is responsible for drafting the annual human-rights report at the US Embassy. To complete that report, Dr Baker looks at several factors such as the rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and religious liberty. These, he says, provide an assessment for how well Jamaica is doing in providing for its citizens' human rights.

Baker said the importance of the report can be seen in the reactions of countries, such as China, to negative comments.

"It's not as a direct result of the report, but countries that are not democratic do not respect the rights of their citizens, don't have as close ties with the US as with democratic nations," Baker explained.

"Oftentimes, there might be sanctions or penalties for countries that abuse their citizens or don't recognise their rights," said Baker.

ENDS

my two cents:
Have the US Embassy people realised that GLBT people are ignored?
Maybe we have to lobby them to bring pressure to bear on the government this is of course excluding the smoke screen debate on gay marriage as invented by the gay christian right movement, namely the Lawyers Christian Fellowship

Peace and tolerance.

H

Germany gives pension rights to gay civil partners

By Jessica Green

Germany's high court today ruled that civil partners of government employees are eligible to receive the same pension rights as their straight married counterparts.

Germany’s high court strengthened the rights of gay couples on Thursday, ruling that government employees with registered civil unions are entitled to the same pension plans as married couples.

The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, the highest court in the country, heard the case of a Hamburg public servant who had been in his job since 1991.

The public-sector pension company VBL had refused to consider him in the same way as a married person, despite the fact he had been in a civil partnership for eight years.

Under VBL's stance, he would have received €74 less each month than a heterosexual married man, while his partner would receive no surviving dependants’ pension if he died.

The court ruled today that VBL's position was unconstitutional.

According to The Local, the unnamed man's lawyer Dirk Siegfried said: "I see this as a very big step for the equality of homosexual marriage not only for employee pensions, but in many other areas too."

In August, the same court confirmed that gay and lesbian people can adopt their partner's children, overturning a previous court ruling.

It rejected the argument that to allow the female partner of a child's mother to adopt would undermine the rights of the other biological parent.

A recent study revealed that 6,600 children in Germany are being raised by gay and lesbian parents.

However, gay or lesbian people or couples cannot adopt children they are not related to.

Social Democrat politicians, including Germany's Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries, have called for a change to the law.

Gay and lesbian couples can register their partnerships and their rights include most of those of marriage, including the possibility of stepchild adoption, but they are denied the same tax benefits.

Source TL News
A failure to give gay partners the same benefits infringes the basic right to equal treatment, the Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe said.

The decision nullified an earlier ruling from the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) regarding a Hamburg man who has been a public servant since 1991 with a supplementary pension. The public-sector pension company VBL – the largest such company in the nation – refused to give the man married status, despite the fact that he’d been living in a registered civil union for eight years. This meant that his retirement benefits would be €74 less each month, and his partner would receive no surviving dependants’ pension in the event of his death.

But constitutional law forbids privileging one group above another, the court found. VBL is now required to adjust its benefits.

“I see this as a very big step for the equality of homosexual marriage not only for employee pensions, but in many other areas too,” the Hamburg man’s lawyer Dirk Siegfried said.

Openly gay Green party MP Volker Beck called the decision a “conclusive breakthrough.”

The legal protection of marriage and family can no longer be used to discriminate against homosexual couples, Beck added, calling the ruling a “clear defeat for the conservative ideologists” in among Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union.

He also encouraged the German government to give homosexual couples equal treatment in tax law.

Buju Banton's show at Trincity/Palm Beach Club faces opposition

Scenes from Tuesday night's protest in Dallas. Buju Banton meanwhile it has been reported that he didn't know the "Faggot" word he used was so offensive to lgbt people as it is considered normal in Jamaica.

More on the story HERE

Opposition sides with Govt on No to same sex marriage

Yesterday during the debate on the Charter of Fundamental Rights & Freedoms in Parliament the Opposition party the Peoples National Party PNP joined the institutional discrimination action to oppose Gay Marriage in Jamaica. The Charter which is being debated on the question of gender and rights sand freedoms for gays and lesbians in particular has had infused deliberately the invented gay marriage issue which was never a point of contention by the GLBT community or JFLAG for that matter.

As JFLAG recently described the gay marriage issue as a smoke screen to push the anti gay agenda and as I see it it's an invented discussion from very early in the debate as far back as 2006. Mrs Portia Simpson Miller on her feet in parliament said.


Find more music like this on GLBTQ Jamaica Members' LINKUP


Please scroll using the green bar on the right to the relevant post title matching the audio post as hosted on GLBTQJA's NING Membership page. Double click the item(s) of interest to commence playing or use Soundcloud:

No to Gay Marriage in Jamaica etc .. my two cents by glbtqja

The PNP seems to have forgotten that it has a large active GLBT support base and with her leadership being brought into question several times one wonders what will the community say or do about this. Obviously this is just to side with the popular view as our politicians are weak as rats and only pander to the public in order to avoid controversy and criticisms. The gay marriage issue was invented by the religious right chiefly among them is the Lawyer's Christian Fellowship with one of its chief personalities Shirley Richards.

See Gay Marriage - An Invented Issue by the christian right movement post with references to previous submissions made by them on the Charter of Rights Bill debate. Here is another grandstanding by our opportunist politicians who use issues like this to make themselves shine in the eyes of the public and again the GLBT community is side stepped in the name of convenience when even within the PNP at practically ALL levels of the party there were and are gays let us not fool ourselves for one minute. We must call it as we see it,

what are we afraid of in giving rights and recognition to GLBT people?
do people feel as of gays are somehow going to poison or infect others with homosexuality?
are society's mores going to change simply because GLBT people are allowed their own set of rights?
why is the GLBT community not talking more about this and other issues actively?
why is everyone acting as if gays aren't in both political parties at various levels?

We have a long way to go in just doing the right thing without worrying about loss of political capital, the PNP now looks hypocritical in all this some time ago when Ernest Smith made those awful and unfortunate remarks in Parliament it was the PNP surprisingly who produced a press release condemning the PM's actions and his use of his Parliamentary privileges.

See these posts
Gleaner Editorial - Credit to the PNP in the face of Mr Smith's stupidity

Opposition, People's National Party condemns anti gay comments as dangerous precedence from GLBTQ Jamaica.

Institutionalised homophobia is on folks and we are again shafted in the name of political cowardice and theocracy with a government face.

Peace and tolerance.

H

SMM protests Sizzla in Denmark

The Star News on October 20, 2009 published this story on SMM in Denmark protesting Sizzla performing in that side of the world while Buju faces his evils in the US. The story is written in a balanced form it seems and doesn't have the usual synical tone the Star normally takes on these issues that could be becuase they know they are being followed by a larger international readership particularly symapthetic to this issue. It seems the SMM campaign is now in world effect mode and are going after dancehall and other acts who perform anti gay music and promote or incite violence to gays, predominantly Jamaican GLBT people.

article by Sadeke Brooks:
Members of the gay and lesbian community are again making their voices heard when it comes to reggae artistes with anti-gay messages.

First it was a slew of concert cancellations for Buju Banton on his North American tour to promote his latest album Rasta Got Soul, as members of the gay community aggressively picketed every venue the 'Gargamel' was slated to perform. They got the upper hand as Buju conceded to a meeting with a group in San Francisco last Monday. However, Buju made no promises about changing his opinions on the taboo community.

Now fellow Rastafarian reggae artiste Sizzla Kalonji is facing the latest verbal outbursts on his European tour.

Late last week, a concert venue said it would cancel his show in Denmark if he did not change his anti-gay stance.

However, the threat was later withdrawn.

The artiste, whose real name is Miguel Collins, was scheduled to perform at the Danish venue Pumpehuset last night.

The Copenhagen Post claimed Sizzla said he was a 'role model' for young people in Jamaica and stood by his anti-gay stance. He was quoted as saying he only signed the Reggae Compassionate Act so he could continue performing in Europe.

However, Sizzla replied shortly after on Pumpehuset's website saying he was misquoted.

"It is clear that what I have said has been misconstrued in an interview I had given since I have been on tour. Some who are interviewed, granted interviews in good faith, others may have other motives or axes to grind but I have none," the statement said.


equal rights and justice

It continued: "I believe in peace, equal rights and justice for all mankind and malice towards none. The Reggae Compassionate Act was signed with that belief and it will not change. Me signing the Reggae Compassionate Act is my unflinching belief and commitment towards its goals. In all my shows that I have done so far, I have not wavered from that commitment, which will stand to a lasting testimony."

When contacted, Sizzla's publicist, Olimatta Taal, confirmed on Sunday night that the concert was still scheduled for last night.

Sizzla was not available for a comment but Taal says she speaks on his behalf.

"It is evident that Sizzla and other artistes in the reggae industry are being attacked. These organisations have protested concerts and used the press as a tool to push their agenda. Many concerts have been cancelled as a result of their actions and lots of money have been lost. There is a bigger picture that I think these organisations are not looking at," she told THE STAR.

She added: "Sizzla and the other reggae artistes are all products of a strong, rich Caribbean culture with certain values and principles. They have all been moulded by environments that are a marriage of love and hate, poor and rich, Christian and Rasta, peace and violence. They use reggae music as a way to express themselves, be the voice of the voiceless and the marginalised. Most times the topics they discuss and sing about are controversial but that is the beauty of reggae music and its mother Rastafari. "

Buju Banton's meeting with the gay group in San Francisco has received mixed responses. While some said it was overdue, others questioned his moral mettle.

Buju, who recently relinquished a portion of his estate in an out of court settlement with long-time domestic partner Lorna Strachan, said in the meeting they spoke and he listened and he spoke and they listened.

One of the gay activists noted that Buju's views were shaped by Jamaica's homophobic behaviour and anti-buggering laws.

Earlier this year, Human Rights Watch wrote to Prime Minister Bruce Golding urging action to stem endemic violence against gays, bisexuals and transgender people in Jamaica.

Just last week, during the debate on the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, Golding reiterated that the country's Parliament would not recognise same-sex marriage or union while he was in power.

"I make no apology in saying decisively and emphatically that the Government of Jamaica remains irrevocably opposed to the recognition, legitimisation or acceptance of same-sex marriages or same-sex unions," Golding declared at the debate last Tuesday.

Taal pointed out that Jamaica's views on homosexuality is not unique and that the gay community is being selective with its demonstrations.

"The whole world is torn around the issues of homosexuality and homophobia but reggae music is the scapegoat with reggae artistes as the targets," she said. "The lovers and supporters of reggae music must stand up and unite to protect reggae artistes and reggae music, which are misunderstood."

2 more suspects for Terry's murder .....

According to the Jamaica Observer Oct 21, 2009 two more suspects were held for Terry's murder - MONTEGO BAY, St James - Two men were held in the Bushy Park area of St Catherine Friday in connection with the murder of John Terry, the former British honorary consul who was murdered in St James last month.

TERRY... was found dead at his home in Mount Carey, St James on September 9.
According to Assistant Commissioner of Police Les Green, one of the men is from St James, while the other resides in Bushy Park.

Their detention brings to three, the number of persons that have so far been held in connection with the much-publicised murder.

Earlier this month, a 23-year-old man- whose name is still being withheld by the police- was arrested in St Catherine.

Green told reporters in Montego Bay that the first suspect, who is charged with attempted murder and wounding in unrelated matters, is to face an identification parade soon.

He stressed, however, that the 23-year-old is still being interrogated in connection with Terry's murder.

The other two, the assistant commissioner added, are being interviewed and at least one, he noted, is likely to face an identification parade.

Terry was found dead at his home in Mount Carey, St James on September 9.

His body was nude and he appeared to have been beaten with a blunt object. The body was wrapped in a sheet and a post-mortem revealed that the man was strangled to death.

Residents of Mount Carey said a man was seen running from Terry's home the night before the body was found.

Green, meanwhile, said that the investigations into the former British consul's death was progressing satisfactorily.

"I am very much satisfied. We have made some good strides," he said. "We have had good support from the residents of St James and Jamaica as a whole, and we have been provided with some good information from witnesses."

Let the dust settle ..........

Presently the war of words with the Gay community's campaign in the US specifically San Francisco with the murder music fallout concerning Buju Banton's Boom Bye Bye song is drowning out the rational thinking and important discussion on tolerance and how to move forward as people despite sexual orientation with everyone taking sides on the issue of homosexuality in Jamaica.

With Buju supposedly no end to the war comment reiterated on a radio program recently that has created a firestorm from the groups and individuals who are already incensed from the meeting with gay representatives in San Francisco they called for financial donations to JFLAG among other things which were deemed unrealistic. I am of the view that with heated exchanges and cross and counter cross bickering we won't see the possible solutions and or ideas for us to move forward.


Find more audio posts like this on GLBTQ Jamaica Members' LINKUP, send an email to lgbtevent@gmail.com to be approved

Scroll to the title that matches this post title double click or press play once highlighted to hear the audio response) (ignore snapvine references as they are now closed {March 31st 2010} as recorded then as my original audio hosts)

Mutabaruka's Cutting Edge Program - Buju Meets With Gays radio discussion with Buju via phone
(Muta photographed)

Buju Banton may never capitulate to the strong opposition from the GLBT community and in the backyard of the most powerful gay lobby community that there may be in the world. He is now reportedly relegated to smaller venues with patronage to the tour being just the West Indian community, some African Americans and a few white supporters which includes gays with some many dates cancelled upon last count by yours truly:

50 dates booked and more in the works
App 32 shows cancelled
9+ reschedules

these of course are figures known from the Cancel Buju Banton site

This obviously is not a successful tour as being hailed by his management and certain members of the local media. In fairness in looking at this issues and all sides contending Buju has made some comments following the meeting in presenting his new image including this one from a recent newspaper article:

"I love everyone in the world. I don't love no special group from another group. There are other needy organisations out there."

If Mr. Mark Myrie, Buju's real name has moved on from his naive youthful exuberance when he first recorded and performed Boom Bye Bye some 17 years ago which also raises the question about a youth's ability to come up with such awful lyrics at his age of 16 begs examination as well, why doesn't he and his management pull the song and distance himself from such horrible lyrics calling for the death of a set of persons he doesn't like?

If Rastafari is to represent love and he Buju Banton has seen the light then do the right thing, just separate himself from this evil past. Some critics like Mutabaruka, a Rastafarian poet and public persona I have a lot of respect for, has said as bourne in the recording above that Buju Banton has turned a new page and has not recorded lyrics that advocate hate and violence since his conversion to Rastafari then why doesn't Muta encourage Buju Banton then as a senior statesman in the Rastafari movement to pull the song from the market and disassociate himself from any such derogatory remarks of death and mayhem towards GLBT people?

The Record is 17 years old

In this digital age recordings be they audio or video have a longer shelf life and it's not like this recording is going to go away these are not the days of old vinyl 12'' and 45s recording where records get lost or damaged from overplay and poor care of the discs and fade from popularity, the public including young kids have direct access to this and similar kinds of materials, it's on YouTube and other social media and can be downloaded from free mp3 sites, blogs and engines just the same, so the argument that he recorded the song some 17 years ago is not the issue and is a poor excuse to justify the continued preservation of such materials.

There will always be new listeners especially the impressionable youths would will believe this kind of rally cry and with all the craziness out there who knows there may just be someone who takes it literally and decides to act. I think we lost a golden opportunity to speak to Buju about this rationally without asking for unrealistic goals and basically insulting his intelligence in fairness to ask for him to donate money to GLBT people here. I am certainly not interested in any money from murder music and not asking him to "buy" his way into our favour.

We have get our heads clear and work when the dust settles to have continued meaningful dialogue where possible.

In the meantime still a deafening silence from the rest of the dancehall community including other murder music artists like Capleton, Sizzla, Elephant Man and Mavado.

Peace

H

Gays may have overstepped their bounds giving Buju ultimatum says human rights activist

Human rights activist Yvonne McCalla Sobers, photographed, convener of Families Against Terrorism, FAST is contending that the overseas gay community may have overstepped its bounds in the demands put to local artist Buju Banton in a recent meeting following the impasse in the Cancel Buju Banton agitations where protest and boycotts were levied chiefly due to Buju's song Boom Bye Bye and his call for the killing of gays.

News came earlier this week that Banton, whose real name is Mark Myrie met with representatives of the gay community, following the cancellation of several of his concerts.

However Mrs. McCalla-Sobers who was speaking Sunday on RJR's weekly news review programme "That's a Rap!" argued that international gay organizations may have pushed too hard and may have been working at cross purposes to the aims of the local gay community.

According to Radio Jamaica she said she has spoken with persons in the local gay community directly and through workshops and during these discussions, the rights they were interested in were not those put forward to Buju Banton by the international gay community.

"If discrimination and the buggery law were some of the issues raised by the international gay community I would say yes you have been speaking to persons here and this is what matter.

But I'm not sure about any of those issues that they raised and how in fact these may create the local backlash that the local gay community may not want to experience,"

Mrs. McCalla Sobers commented on Sunday October 18, 2009 on Radio Jamaica's RJR weekly news review programme That's a Rap!.

The California-based gay activists reportedly demanded that the DJ hold town hall meetings to profess respect and love for gays, make donations to Jamaica Forum of Lesbians, All-Sexuals and Gays (JFLAG) and sing songs about loving gay people.

Buju Banton and his management team reportedly rejected out right all the suggestions put on the table.

(excerpts from RJR)

International Day for the Eradication of Poverty - 17/10/09

"The campaign to make poverty history-a central moral challenge of our age-cannot remain a task for the few, it must become a calling for the many. On this International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, I urge everyone to join this struggle. Together, we can make real and sufficient progress towards the end of poverty."

United Nations Ex-Secretary-General, Kofi Annan"Excerpts taken from his message to be delivered on the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, 17 October 2006".

October 17, 2009 marked the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. The poverty rate in the United States has now risen to 13.2 percent, the highest level in eleven years of course developed states are used as a benchmark of sorts. And around the world, two billion people, or a full third of humanity, are poor, living on less than $2 a day. One billion live in extreme poverty, earning less than $1 a day. The latest numbers from the United Nations indicate that over a billion people are also going hungry. Irene Khan argues that these harsh numbers alone don’t tell the whole story. Poverty, the book argues, must be recognized as the world’s worst human rights crisis.

The observance of the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty can be traced back to 17 October 1987. On that day, over a hundred thousand people gathered at the Trocadéro in Paris, where the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed in 1948, to honour the victims of extreme poverty, violence and hunger. They proclaimed that poverty is a violation of human rights and affirmed the need to come together to ensure that these rights are respected. These convictions are inscribed in a commemorative stone unveiled on this day. Since then, people of all backgrounds, beliefs and social origins have gathered every year on October 17 th to renew their commitment and show their solidarity with the poor. Replicas of the commemorative stone have been unveiled around the world and serve as a gathering place to celebrate the Day.

One such replica is located in the garden of United Nations Headquarters and is the site of the annual commemoration organized by the United Nations Secretariat in New York. Through resolution 47/196 adopted on 22 December 1992, the General Assembly declared 17 October as the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty and invited all States to devote the Day to presenting and promoting, as appropriate in the national context, concrete activities with regard to the eradication of poverty and destitution.

The resolution further invites intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations to assist States, at their request, in organizing national activities for the observance of the Day, and requests the Secretary-General to take, within existing resources, the measures necessary to ensure the success of the Day's observance by the United Nations. October 17th presents an opportunity to acknowledge the effort and struggle of people living in poverty, a chance for them to make their concerns heard, and a moment to recognize that poor people are the first ones to fight against poverty. Participation of the poor themselves has been at the center of the Day's celebration since its very beginning. The commemoration of October 17 th also reflects the willingness of people living in poverty to use their expertise to contribute to the eradication of poverty.

GA Resolution A/RES/47/196 of 31 March 1993

Amnesty International Head Irene Khan on “The Unheard Truth: Poverty and Human Rights

Irene Khan, Secretary General of Amnesty International. Born in Bangladesh, she is the first Asian woman to head Amnesty International. She won the Sydney Peace Prize in 2006, and her book, out in the US today, is called The Unheard Truth: Poverty and Human Rights.

More on the IDEP HERE

ESCAP

also see Democracy Now for broadcasts on World Human Rights issues.

H

Video - Lorri Jean, head of the LA Gay Center says Buju Banton's Meeting in San Fran was a PR coo

An angry LA Gay and Lesbian Centre leader was interviewed outside one of the venues where Buju Banton was set to perform.
She likened the recent meeting of Buju Banton and Gay representatives as a PR coo.

Black LGBTs low presence on SMM issues

Some controversy here but it is needed if we are to examine our roles and positions in the "fight" as some say for equality in Jamaica.
With all the exchanges taking place on Buju Banton's music and the strong opposition from the seemingly all white powerful gay lobby and rightly so I might add towards this kind of music, it is of note that there are very few voices from the black GLBT community overall, be it African Americans of GLBT people from other Caribbean nations. I strongly believe it has to have a black element as well so as to dispel the wide spread perceptions of homosexuality in Jamaica as an import.

All the more reason for the anti gay lobby, Buju Banton with supporters and the naive amongst us to suggest and or believe that it is these "white people" who are forcing their "nasty lifestyle" on Jamaica. Yes, believe it or not there are people in modern day Jamaica who buy into this perception and hence the race card and other possible controversial issues come up. What is also of interest is that this perception runs across classes, religion and levels of education. Just check out some of the Jamaican chat forums and threads across the Internet and even at the Gleaner where people go to town with there comments backing Buju and some of the anti gay rhetoric. Other major current affairs do not command the volume and types of responses as whenever homosexuality in Jamaica is brought up.

However issues such as the differences in how financially well to do mostly white GLBT groups trump on certain mainstream gay issues like gay marriage and prop 8 while bread and butter issues such as their own survival of working class GLBT persons of African descent overlooked in some instances in the US.

There are a few black GLBT voices that have been added during this present SMM reinvention in the US as I call it in recent times especially at the ground level in the form of protests at some of Buju Banton's planned concerts. Are they relegated to or wish to be involved in only front line duties in this effort? that question is yet to be answered in my mind but I would much prefer to see GLBT persons of African descent in this fight as well especially Jamaicans gay or straight of whatever stripe who are just interested in justice, fairness and tolerance. Our low level of interest in this matter too is of concern to me as it's not about silencing Buju Banton or other artists but arriving at a level of tolerance. Many seem to have a feeling that we may not "win" the battle as I have heard some say, there is no battle for me as far as I am concerned it just doing what's appropriate. We cannot sit by and just have a casual interest in matters like these especially the Charter of Rights debate and the smoke screen gay marriage discussion.

I feel that non gay Jamaicans including the anti gay lobby ought to watch how these issues are handled as subversion or repression of rights to one group can eventually spread to anyone else if and when required to achieve whatever political end.

Of note the cancel Buju page hardly has any black GLBT members either from Jamaica or the diaspora in the UK, USA or Canada for that matter and it begs the question whether we are patriotic or just forgetful of Jamaica once we leave the shores in the case of GLBT Jamaicans who are abroad. Yes I agree that one may leave to get a better life but certainly one ought not to just forget ones nation to the point of failure to participate in matters of pertinence to your fellow countrymen left behind in the struggle. It also looks pitiful as if foreigners seem to be more interested in our cause than we ourselves.
Never have we seen the kinda of a response to anti gay rhetoric from Jamaica so uniformed and pronounced there needs to be more support from the ground up.

Don't get me wrong I am 100% in support of some of the points of view taken by the campaign which is to arrive at some level playing field in discussing the issues of murder music and tolerance inclusive of recognition and rights, we can always agree or disagree as to the methods employed to get there.

Overall I think we as the Jamaican GLBT community have become to relaxed because of a false sense of security, yes the incidents of homophobic abuse may be tapering off for this year but what about vigilance and avoiding future considerations for same we should never discount the possibilities of the craziness that can occur. I have been criticised for being an alarmist but I am real about matters like this, one cannot have ones head in the clouds.

Think on these things folks.

H

UGANDA: AIDS activists protest anti-gay bill

from IRN click logo to follow other pertinent news from Africa

NAIROBI, 16 October 2009 (PlusNews) - A draft bill before the Ugandan parliament that seeks to impose stricter sanctions on homosexuality would drive men who have sex with men further underground, making it even more difficult for them to access HIV services, according to AIDS activists. According to Uganda's New Vision newspaper, the draft bill, tabled by ruling party MP David Bahati, proposes a seven-year jail term for anyone who "attempts to commit the offence" or who "aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage in acts of homosexuality".

"If this bill is passed it will be a clear violation of human rights and will push men who have sex with men even further underground than they are," Beatrice Were, a Ugandan HIV/AIDS activist, told IRIN/PlusNews. "Our national strategic plan for HIV/AIDS aims to achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care, but if people are criminalized and not allowed to exist, how can they access these services?" she added.

Homosexual acts, or "carnal knowledge against the order of nature", are already criminalized in Uganda, carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Under the draft bill, “promotion of homosexuality”, including publishing information or providing funds, premises for activities, or other resources, is also punishable by a seven-year sentence or a fine of US$50,000.

If passed, the bill would see the death penalty handed down for the crime of “aggravated homosexuality” - a sexual assault committed against a member of the same sex who is under 18 or disabled. Anyone found guilty of the offence of homosexuality would be forced to take an HIV test.
Morals don't stop HIV; what stops HIV is the evidence from science "Bahati's proposed bill also supports stigma and discrimination against HIV-positive people, and would undermine years of efforts to tackle the epidemic," Solome Nakaweesi-Kimbugwe, a human rights activist, and Frank Mugisha, co-chair of the rights group, Sexual Minorities Uganda, said in a statement. "Uganda has been considered a 'best practice' leader in the fight against HIV and AIDS," the statement continued. "If [the bill is] passed, this leadership status would be put in serious question."

The Uganda AIDS Commission classes men who have sex with men (MSMs) as “most at risk”, yet there are no HIV programmes targeting them and no action has been taken in response to a 2009 study by UNAIDS and the Uganda government recommending that "legal impediments to the inclusion of most-at-risk populations, including commercial sex workers, MSMs and IDUs [intravenous drug users], in the HIV/AIDS national response should be reviewed".

"Morals do not stop HIV; what stops HIV is the evidence from science - we know that using condoms can prevent infection, using PEP [post-exposure prophylaxis] after exposure can stop infection, and ARVs [life-prolonging anti-retroviral drugs] prevent mother-to-child transmission," Were said. "People must feel comfortable enough to seek these services regardless of their sexual orientation." kr/bp/mw

Letter to the Gleaner Editor - suggest gays want to destroy Buju

Gays determined to destroy Buju

The Editor, Sir:

It seems as if 17 years after DJ Buju Banton sang Boom Bye Bye, the international gay community is hell-bent on destroying everything he does. He has already apologised; he refrains from repeating any such lyrics in his songs, yet the gay community is still not satisfied. Just recently they tried desperately to attack every show that he was set to perform on in the United States.

Now gays are quick to cry out against discrimination, victimisation, and isolation, yet they refuse to forgive this man for over 17 years. How can you practise victimisation against someone and at the same time complain when it is against you?

As talented a writer as Buju Banton is, there is no doubt he could have produced many more 'wickeder' songs than Boom Bye Bye. But he did not.

Unrealistic demands

Recently, he met with the gay community in San Francisco and they tried to make unrealistic demands on him, demands such as donating all the proceeds from Boom Bye Bye to local gay group J-Flag. This is not possible and seems more like an attempt to perpetuate the strife more than to resolve it.

Many people do not condone the gay lifestyle but that is no reason to advocate the killing of gays. Gays, in the meantime, should understand that their lifestyle is contrary to what most people have been taught and they should not seek to shove it down other people's throats. We should respect everyone rights to do whatever they want as long it is in their own privacy and it is not forced on others.

I am, etc.,

ALVIN BUCHANAN
USA

END of Letter

Some Questions to us all to ponder in fairness:

1. When did Buju Banton ever apologised?
2. Isn't there a responsibility that public personalities must be accountable to?
3. Is it that a celebrity can say anything that comes to mind even incite hate and murder ?
4. Why didn't the writer (Alvin) produce the evidence of the so called apology?
5. Where and when was it ever suggested that any LGBT group wants to destroy anyone?
6. Isn't it Buju who suggests human destruction by the lyrics in Boom Bye Bye?
7. Where and when can we overlook people's sexual preference and just see people as people?
8. Why can't we all just get along and deal with more important issues at hand?
9. When will we ever realise our motto? - Out of Many, One People

Online paper suggest JFLAG members be arrested

A little known online publication named the Kingston Chronicle has called for the arrest of JFLAG members with this headline and pointers:

The Kingston Chronicle wrote:

The Jamaican Government needs to lock up all JFLAG members and charge them for inciting Terrorist activities against Buju Banton & Reggae Music!

San Francisco Mayor is alleged to have said that informants in Jamaica are sending him information that Jamaica is the “MURDER CAPITAL OF THE WORLD FOR GAYS”
Now the good thing about the information is that it is 99% true.

The bad thing about it is, the murders are not Heterosexuals. Thus if the informants had stated that “JAMAICA IS THE MURDER CAPITAL OF THE WORLD FOR GAYS BY GAYS” then they would be 100% correct.

It is alleged as a result of this false and malicious information from Jamaica, carefully orchestrated with these terrorist groups targeting Buju Banton’s concerts are directly tied with the aims and goals of JFLAG.

The nerve of these people to name their sick and immoral lifestyle with an acronym that passes as Jamaican Flag.

I call for GAZA & GULLY SIDE to unite and support Buju Banton in Jamaica.

GAZA MI SEH, GULLY MI SEH, BUJU MI SEH.

By,

The Nationalist

My two cents:
This just illustrates ignorance and sheer intolerance on the writers part. JFLAG is not a membership organization and no one from JFLAG or any other group initiated the boycott campaign against Buju Banton, he did that himself over the years with statements like the war between him and the faggots won't end which he repeated some days ago on a radio program with Mutabaruka.

The gay community in the United States are not going to sit by and allow any crap as we all know especially in San Francisco which is deemed the gay capital of America.
It is not about promoting homosexuality as there is no need to promote an orientation, people so choose to act on their urges desires and identity. The Gully/Gaza comment clearly indicates the level of ignorance involved here as well.

Gaza has always been associated with terrorism and civil war and Gully always refers to waste removal of drainage, is this what we have reduced our country to, factions liking to these two meanings? I thought Jamaica was about "Out of many one people" not two tribes as carved by two dancehall artists, Vybz Kartel (Gaza) and Mavado (Gully) who are clearly playing with fan's affections to remain relevant while the same fans kill themselves off in defense of the respective groups, they the artists drink champagne and laughing at all of us. Boy, talk about mental slavery.

When will we ever just live and let live?

H

A. J. Nicholson pushes on the Privy Council & the Death Penalty

Senator A. J. Nicholson writes in the Gleaner, 16/10/09

Lord Hoffman was right

The Editor, Sir:
The approach of the Privy Council to the interpretation of our constitutional provisions relating to the right to life and the death penalty, over time, impelled one of its judges, Lord Hoffman, to warn his brethren, in a compelling and prophetic dissenting judgment, that, if they continued on the course they had adopted, it would cause instability and lead to serious problems for the administration of criminal justice in the Common-wealth Caribbean. Here in Jamaica, for sure, his words have long come to pass. Consider, for example, the following scenario:

1. The majority of Jamaicans are in favour of the death penalty as the punishment for certain crimes and they continue to blame 'the Government' for not having the punishment carried out. No one wishes that a 'rift' between the people and the authorities, on any score, should continue; it causes instability.

2. The members of Jamaica's Parliament, by an overwhelming majority in a conscience vote, have endorsed the sentiment that the penalty should be retained in Jamaica.

3. The Privy Council rejects the idea that the five-year stricture that it has laid down for the penalty being carried out should be relaxed to take account of delays normally involved in the disposal of applications to human rights bodies.

4. The Opposition and the Caribbean Court of Justice (in its judgment in the Joseph and Boyce appeal from Barbados) disagree with the position taken by the Privy Council on this issue. So the clear choice for the Parliament is to do something about the five-year stricture imposed by the Privy Council or insist that Jamaica subscribe to the CCJ, whose integrity, like that of the Privy Council, cannot be questioned.

5. It is now proposed that all of the provisions of the Charter of Rights, including the right to life and other sensitive issues, are to be passed and adjudicated upon by the Privy Council and it is being said that nothing should be done by the Parliament concerning the death penalty five-year stricture. Indeed, in some quarters, the contrary stance being taken by the parliamentary Opposition, according to a view expressed in Thursday's Gleaner editorial, is referred to as "regrettable political opportunism". As we say in Jamaica, "Life hard". Lord Hoffman was right!


Further than that, my colleague, Anthony Gifford, asserts that we "disagree on many things, not least the morality of the death penalty as a punishment". I have, several times over, publicly stated my position, that I am not in favour of the death penalty. My contribution and my answer in the conscience vote debate in the Senate, last November, again underlined that sentiment. I am certain that my colleague shares the same view. Lord Hoffman was bang on with his prediction. The approach of his brethren has even caused my colleague to "disagree" with me on matters on which we agree.

I am, etc.,

A. J. NICHOLSON

Opposition Spokesman

on Justice