Prime Minister, the Hon. Bruce Golding speaking in the House of Representatives on December 21. |
Prime Minister, the Hon. Bruce Golding has suggested the possibility of Jamaica establishing its own final Court of Appeal as an option to the United Kingdom based Privy Council or the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).
"We have to dispense with the Privy Council. We are not yet satisfied that in doing so, we must take out a final court which is an external entity, over which we do not have final control as a State," Mr. Golding said, during the debate on the Charter of Rights in the House of Representatives on December 21.
"We wish to consider this in great detail, and in earnest, we believe that we have the judicial experience to do it.
We believe that we have the maturity to do it. We wish to consider establishing our final court of appeal in Jamaica.
We would respectfully wish that this is something for which consideration ought to be given," he said.
Mr. Golding further noted that the adoption of a final court should be "put to Jamaicans in a referendum."
"I don't think any of us in here must ever make the mistake of presuming that there is any consensus among the people of Jamaica on this, nor must we ever seek to assume that the majority of those people will vote in a particular way," the Prime Minister said.
He pointed out that there are members of both the Government and Opposition in favour of the Caribbean Court of Justice as the final court of appeal for Jamaicans.
"We want to give the people something more than what they have, because what they have is something that is not even in their hands. We have given them rights, but we have to ensure that those rights remain in our hands," he added.
Meanwhile, Leader of the Opposition, the Most Hon. Portia Simpson Miller noted that the Opposition was in support of the CCJ as the country's final court of appeal.
The CCJ is the regional judicial entity established nine years ago, to be the final appellate court for member states of the Caribbean Community. While Jamaica is a signatory to the establishment of the CCJ, the country has yet to utilise the court, as cases from the island are still referred to the Privy Council.
Critics however say the only way to get the court is through a referendum and that the Prime Minister was not clear while on his feet in Parliament on December 21, 2010 wherein there was a war of words with the Opposition leader Portia Simpson Miller who warned that if the administration didn't leave and adopt the CCJ then her party if they regained power would. They also issued a statement this afternoon that the PM was confusing, the PM should have also consulted the opposition before announcing the move in parliament.
Frank Phipps asked do we need a further appeal from the Jamaican court in a case? he referred to a 2004 earlier today in a case where the same UK based Privy Council suggested whether what the Jamaican people wanted to leave them as the final appellate or adopt the Caribbean Court of Justice. He continued that there needs sufficient time to inform the people of Jamaica about what rights, freedoms and practices before the very referendum. There must be no political interference all political parties must not seek to win hearts and possible votes in this sensitive issue.
Ronnie Thwaites Opposition Member of Parliament suggests the issue may get cluttered as were previous Caribbean issues such as the Federation where political foot dragging impeded the decisions processes required.
Peace and tolerance
H
1 comments:
What's the time frame for this to happen? Sounds a bit vague.
Post a Comment