a. Make a phone call: to a lawyer or relative or anyone
b. Ask to see a lawyer immediately: if you don’t have the money ask for a Duty Council
c. A Duty Council is a lawyer provided by the state
d. Talk to a lawyer before you talk to the police
e. Tell your lawyer if anyone hits you and identify who did so by name and number
f. Give no explanations excuses or stories: you can make your defense later in court based on what you and your lawyer decided
g. Ask the sub officer in charge of the station to grant bail once you are charged with an offence
h. Ask to be taken before a justice of The Peace immediately if the sub officer refuses you bail
i. Demand to be brought before a Resident Magistrate and have your lawyer ask the judge for bail
j. Ask that any property taken from you be listed and sealed in your presence
Cases of Assault:An assault is an apprehension that someone is about to hit you
The following may apply:
1) Call 119 or go to the station or the police arrives depending on the severity of the injuries
2) The report must be about the incident as it happened, once the report is admitted as evidence it becomes the basis for the trial
3) Critical evidence must be gathered as to the injuries received which may include a Doctor’s report of the injuries.
4) The description must be clearly stated; describing injuries directly and identifying them clearly, show the doctor the injuries clearly upon the visit it must be able to stand up under cross examination in court.
5) Misguided evidence threatens the credibility of the witness during a trial; avoid the questioning of the witnesses credibility, the tribunal of fact must be able to rely on the witness’s word in presenting evidence
6) The court is guided by credible evidence on which it will make it’s finding of facts
7) Bolster the credibility of a case by a report from an independent disinterested party.
2 comments:
Good summary. With the heavy debt burden, neither party has much room to bring about improvement in the lives of the people right now.
The murder rate needs to be addressed as the #1 priority - if that could be brought down, other things would start to improve, too, I feel.
I do not think it would be too difficult to repeal the buggery laws. Both parties would have to agree not to make an issue of it, in the interest of Jamaica's world image, the tourism business, or even the fact that the western world has changed its approach to the issue, and now regards gay rights as part of human rights.
It's more a question of when, rather than if, it happens, I think.
Well, since nuff odda tings - of their own making! - deh fi dem heng demself wid, I don't see how repealing the buggery laws or passing other important anti-discrimination legislation would be any worse. If nothing, they would come out like martyrs, having done some good on behalf of Jamaicans, rather than smelling rancid as some of them do now.
Post a Comment